The Influence of Chief Executive Officer Power on Diversity of Gender and Dividend Policy in Kenya

  • Benjamin Oduori Department of Finance, Kibabii University
  • David Kosgei Department of Management Science, School of Business and Economics, Moi University
Keywords: Chief Executive Officer Power, Diversity, dividend policy, Gender, Kenya


Enterprises management has encountered challenges emanating from internal manager’s inability to successfully provide stewardship. The corporation’s owners therefore, have to devise processes that guarantee that their stakes are safeguarded. In modern corporation’s owners embrace mechanisms like board diversity to mitigate against managers’ failures to act in their best interests. This paper’s aim is to assess the influence of Chief Executive Officer Power moderation among gender diversity and dividend policy. The research employed an explanatory research design targeting corporations registered on the Nairobi Securities Exchange in time spanning from 2009 to 2015. The research findings indicate a favorable and important outcome on the interactions which implied that CEO power moderated the linkage between diversity of gender and dividend policy amid Kenya’s enterprises hence diversity of gender is an important influence in corporation’s board. The research forms a basis from which the regulatory authority could use to ensure full compliance to the statutory requirements on gender diversity so as to safeguard the stakes of stockholders in the enterprises.


Abubakr, S., & Muhammad, S. (2017). Impact of board gender diversity on dividend payments: Evidence from some emerging economies. International Business Review, 26, 1100-1113.

Adams, B. R., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the Boardroom and Their Impact on governance and Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 291-309.

Adams, B. R., Almeida, H., & Ferreiva, D. (2005). Powerful CEOs and Their Impact on Corporate Performance. The Review of Financial Studies 1, 8(4), 1403-1432.

Black, F. (1976). The Dividend Puzzle. Journal of Portfolio Management, 2, 5-8.

Cooke, T. E. (1992). The Impact of Size, Stock Market Listing and Industry Types On The Disclosure in the Annual Reports of Japanese listed corporations. Accounting and Business Research, 22(87), 229-237.

David, A. C., Frank, D., Betty, J. S., & W. Gary Simpson. (2010). The Gender and Ethnic Diversity of US Boards and Board Committees and Firm Financial Performance. Corporate Governance: An International review, 18(5), 396-414.

Davis, F. G., & Cobb, A. J. (2010, March). Resource Dependence Theory: Past and Future. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1-31. doi:10.1108/S0733-558X(2010)0000028006

Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of law and Economics, 26, 301-325.

Gul, A. F., Shnidhi, B., & Mg, C. A. (2011). Does Board Gender Diversity Improve the Informativeness of the stock price? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51, 314-338.

Gul, F. A., Hutchinson, M., & Lai, K. M. (2013). Gender-diverse boards and properties of analyst earnings forecasts. Accounting Horizon, 27(3), 511-538.

Hill, R., Graffiths, W. E., & Lim, G. C. (2011). Principal of Econometrics. 3rd ed. United States of America: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

James, G. C., David, J. K., Alex, A. P., & Maura, S. D. (2007). The Moderating Effect of CEO Power on the Board Composition-Firm Performance Relationship. Journal of Management Studies. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00708.x

Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. Retrieved from

John, A. M., Hafiz, T. A., Robert, R., & David, W. (2007). Research Methods for Graduate Business and Social Science Students.

Michels, R. (1962). Political Parties. New York: Free Press.

Ocasio, W. (1994). Political Dynamics and the Circulation of Power: CEO Succession in U. S. Industrial Corporations, 1960-1990. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 285-312.

Orodh, o. A. (2003). Essentials of Educational and Social Sciences Research Method. Nairobi: Mesola Publishers.

Panda, B., & Leepsa, M. N. (2017). Agency theory: Review of Theory and Evidence on Problems and Perspectives. Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, 10(1), 74–95. doi:10.1177/0974686217701467

Park, H. M. (2011). Practical Guides to Panel Data Modelling: A Step by Step Analysis Using. International University of Japan.

Pfeffer, J. (2003). Introduction to the classic edition, in Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R., The External Control of organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective (classic edition). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Rondøy, T., Thomsen, S., & Oxelheim, L. (2006). A Nordic Perspective on Corporate Board Diversity. Age, 390.

Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Smith, A. (1937). The wealth of nations. (E. Cannan, Ed.) New York, USA: NY: Modern Library.

Soku, B., Kiyoung, C., & Young, S. K. (2016). Does Corporate Board Diversity Affect Corporate Payout Policy? Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 45, 48-101. doi:10.1111/ajfs.12119

Thomsen, S., & Conyon, M. (2012). Corporate Governance: Mechanisms and Systems. London: McGraw-Hill Education.

Zikmund, G. W., Babin, Car, & Griffin. (2010). Business Research Methods. Thomson, South Western.
How to Cite
Oduori, B., & Kosgei, D. (2020, July 17). The Influence of Chief Executive Officer Power on Diversity of Gender and Dividend Policy in Kenya. African Journal of Education,Science and Technology, 6(1), Pg 255-265. Retrieved from