Components of Exogenous Innovation Barriers in Hotels within Nairobi City, Kenya

  • Rita W. Nthiga Department of Hotel and Hospitality Management Moi University - Kenya
Keywords: Components, Exogenous barriers, Innovation barriers, Innovation

Abstract

The aim of this paper was to establish and conceptualize parameters that can be used to measure exogenous innovation barriers. It is important to understand useful indicators that can be used to examine the extent to which the barriers can affect different aspects of management in the hotel sector. The study employed descriptive research design and was conducted in Nairobi city. From a target population of 190 front line employees, 127 formed the sample size for the study. Purposive sampling was used to select three five-star rated hotels in Nairobi, then employees in the hotels were stratified into primary and support departments before systematic sampling was used to select the respondents. Primary data was gathered from employees by use of administered questionnaires. Reliability of data was tested using Cronbach’s Alpha resulting in a value above 0.7. Factor analysis reduced the indicators from ten to three. Hence exogenous innovation can be measured using three components namely; change hurdles, administrative obstructions and entrepreneurial blockades.

References

Australian Government, Australian Public Commission. (2012). Barriers to innovation in the APS. Retrieved from http://www.apsc.gov.au/publications-and-media/archive/publications archive/empowering-change/barriers-accessed on November 13, 2013.

Cordeiro A and, Vieira F (2012),Barriers to Innovation in SMES: An International Comparison‖. Universidade Do Minho, Acordeiro@Dps.Uminho.

Davidsson, P. (1989). Continued Entrepreneurship and Small Firm Growth. Diss. Stockholm. School of Economics, April.

Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Uppersaddle River, N.J.: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Hakim, C. (1989). Identifying Fast Growth Small Firms. Employment Gazette, Jan., pp. 29-41. School of Economics, April.

Henrekson, M. (1996). ‘Företagandetsvillkor’. Stockholm: SNSFörlag.

Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36.

Katz R. (2003), Managing Technological Innovation inBusiness Organizations in: The International Handbook onInnovation, Elsevier Science Ltd., 775-789.

Keegan, J., O‘Connor, A., Cooney, T., Ylinenpää, H., Barth, H., Vesalainen, J., Pihkala, T. in Deschoolmeester, D., and A. Debbaut. (1997). Facing The Challenge - Towards a Better Understanding of Barriers to Innovation in Irish,

Swedish, Finnish and Belgian SMEs.Paper presented to EFMDs 27thEuropean Small Business Seminar in Rhodes, Greece.

Nikolaou I, Vakola M and Bourantas D (2007),―Who speaks up at work? Dispositional influences on employees‘ voice behaviour. Emerald Group Publishing Limited; Athens Vol. 37 No. 6, 2008 pp. 666-679.

Seth, J.N. and Ram, S. (1987). Bringing innovation to market: how to break corporate and customers’ barriers, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York

Stanislawsky, R. and Olczak, A., (2010), Innovative activity in the small business sector of the textile and clothing industry.Fibres & Textiles in Eastern Europe, 18 (1).

Suarez, F. (2004), Battles for technological dominance: an integrative framework. Research Policy, vol. 33, pages 271-286.
Published
2019-01-07
How to Cite
Nthiga, R. (2019, January 7). Components of Exogenous Innovation Barriers in Hotels within Nairobi City, Kenya. African Journal of Education,Science and Technology, 4(4), pp 313-322. Retrieved from http://ajest.info/index.php/ajest/article/view/339
Section
Articles