Putting into Perspective the Integrative Approach to English Language Teaching in Kenya

  • Peter L. Barasa Moi University, P.O. Box. 3900 30100 Eldoret.
  • Carolyne Omulando Moi University, P.O. Box. 3900 30100 Eldoret.
Keywords: Language Teaching Methodology, Integration Approach, Eclecticism, Integration Levels


Worldwide, the field of language teaching has in the last decade been going through a revolution with the quest to come up with methodological approaches that can be regarded as efficient to effectively facilitate the language instructional process. This has borne an on-going debate regarding which is the most effective method and in which direction should language educators go with regard to enhancing the language learning process. From this perspective, an examination of language teaching methods points at a period in the world of language teaching methodology where there was a move away from the concept of “methods” deemed to restrict the teacher to a particular set of instructional practices. Born from this awakening, the concept of “eclecticism” is taking root. Eclecticism advocates focus on language teaching procedures rather than language teaching methods. Among the approaches that are taking root in language instruction is the “integration approach” to language teaching. This approach has now taken deep root, a philosophy that informs innovative classroom practice of the language teacher. Given this orientation, our paper presents a conceptualization and an analysis of the integration approach to teaching language. The paper draws its thread of thought from literature on methodology and authors combined experience of ELT of 26 years. The aim of this paper is to provide direction toward successful and informed implementation of the integration approach at all levels of learning as provided for in the education system in Kenya. We offer a description of various forms of integration levels which we believe are likely to enlighten teachers of English in handling problems arising during the implementation process. We are certain that the perspectives raised here will provide a sound background to the understanding of language teaching practice in Kenya borne from the communicative approach, communicative language teaching and notional-functional approach syllabi and philosophies, and the advocacy for post-method approaches in language teaching which all form the basis for the integration approach.


Barasa, L. P. (2011). Curriculum in English Education In R. N. Otunga, Odero, I. I., & Barasa, L. P. (Eds). A Handbook for Curriculum and Instruction (pp. 171 -188) Eldoret: Moi University Press,

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher Cognition in Language Teaching: A Review of Research on What Language Teachers Think, Know, Believe and do’. Review Article: Language Teaching, 36, 81– 109, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Borg, S. (2006). Teacher Cognition and Language Education: Research and Practice, London: Continuum.

Brown, H. D. (2001) Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, New York: Longman.

Canagarajah, A. S. (2006). TESOL at Forty: What Are the Issues? TESOL Quarterly, 40 (1), 9-34.

Hymes, D. H. (1971). On Communicative Competence. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

KIE (1990). Management and Language Activities: Book One, Kenya Pre-School Teacher’s Activities
Guide Series. Nairobi: KLB.

KIE.(2002a). Primary School Syllabus. One, Nairobi: Kenya Institute of Education.

KIE. (2002b). Secondary Education Syllabus. Vol (1) Nairobi: Kenya Institute of Education.

KIE.(2006a). Secondary English Teacher’s Handbook. Nairobi: Kenya Institute of Education.

KIE.(2006b). Primary Education English Handbook. Nairobi: Kenya Institute of Education.

KIE. (2008a). Handbook for Early Childhood Development Education Syllabus. Nairobi: Kenya Institute of Education.

KIE. (2008b). Early Childhood Development and Education Syllabus. Nairobi: Kenya Institute of Education.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The Postmehtod Condition: (E) merging strategies for second/ foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 27-48.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2006). TESOL Methods: Changing Tracks, Challenging Trends. TESOL Quarterly, 40 (1), 59 – 81.

Nunan, D. (1991) Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers New York: Prentice-Hall.

Omulando, C. & Barasa P. (2013). ‗Language Teaching and Learning: The Interactive Approach‘, Kakamega: MMUST Press, In Kabaji, E., Simala, I & Nasongo, J. (Eds). New horizons in Pedagogy, (pp. 1-13)

Richard, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. New York:

Cambridge University Press.

Richard, J. C., (2006). Communicative Language Teaching Today, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

White, R. V. (1988). The ELT Curriculum: Design, Innovation and Management. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Wilkins, D. A. (1976). Notional Syllabuses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
How to Cite
Barasa, P. L., & Omulando, C. (2018, September 28). Putting into Perspective the Integrative Approach to English Language Teaching in Kenya. African Journal of Education,Science and Technology, 2(2), pp 71-81. Retrieved from http://ajest.info/index.php/ajest/article/view/285